We need the NSB to recognize the gross deficiencies in the NSF review of
proposals. I claim to have discovered everything that is chastised in the
following biased review of the referenced proposal:
Proposal Number: 1132890
NSF Program: THERMAL TRANSPORT PROCESSES
Principal Investigator: Leyse, Robert H
Proposal Title: Proprietary Transformative Separations
Rating: Fair
REVIEW:
What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?
The most compelling portion of this proposal is that the PI has identified an anomalous
boiling heat transfer regime from microscale wire surfaces. Unfortunately, the PI has not
presented a convincing research plan that will lead to a fundamental understanding of
the heat transfer process he has identified. Countless anomalous regimes have been
identified in boiling heat transfer. While the PI believes that his discoveries are
transformative, this Reviewer fails to see it. Truly transformative research will seek to
explain the physical mechanisms driving the anomalous observations, and provide
technologists with the understanding that may lead to technological advances.
However, the PI fails to mention any of the various physical boiling phenomena at
different length and time scale which may influence the process. For example, the PI
claims his measurements are steady state. This completely ignores the time scales
associated with ebullition. The PI claims the dispersive mechanism is turbulence without
any evidence. It can just as easily be hypothesized that the dispersive mechanism is
microbubble growth and collapse that has been observed in highly subcooled systems.
It is unfortunate that the PI has expended so much effort to convince NSF to fund his
proposed research. If the PI is convinced that his discoveries are transformative and
can lead to revolutionary new technology, he should focus his efforts on developing that
technology. For whatever it is worth, this Reviewer believes that the heat transfer
behavior observed is confined to microscale wires, and attempts at scale-up would not
be fruitful.
What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?
It is difficult to identify broader impact associated with the proposal.
Summary Statement
Past Reviewers have been too gentle in pointing out the weaknesses of the proposed
study. The PI should not be encouraged to resubmit a proposal covering the core topic.
Clearly, this NSF reviewer cannot accept the fact that extremely significant
discoveries can be produced outside of academia. Following I have copied
one of the several outstanding discoveries that are in Proposal 1132890.
I think this is sensational. The procedure is to pressurize the apparatus to
about 6000 psi, apply a substantial heat flux in one step, and maintain that
heat flux as pressure is smoothly reduced over about 20 seconds, turn off
power at about 200 psi. Note the gradual increase in temperature as
pressure is reduced, then the upward jump of over 200 Centigrade at
around 3700 psi, followed by a smooth increase of another 100 Centigrade
to the critical pressure, then a smooth decrease of nearly 200 Centigrade,
then a downward jump of about 150 centigrade to the critical temperature.
At that point the subcritical boiling begins and continues until the power is
turned off. At the lowest heat flux there is a smooth continuous plot over the
entire pressure range with no intervening steps. The four plots at increasing
heat fluxes are neatly nested.
Monday, July 27, 2020
Saturday, July 25, 2020
Innovation Deep Research
Technology Innovation. (Up to 500 words)
Why is this deep research? Leyse has pioneered the field of microscale phase change heat transfer to water at ultra-high power density with fine platinum wires, 7.5 μm diameter, that are joule heated in pressurized deionized water. Each wire functions simultaneously as a heat transfer element and as a resistance thermometer as originated by Nukiyama (1934). These experiments cover the pressure range from 200 to 4000 PSIA and the heat flux range from very low to 4000 W/cm2 while bulk water temperature is maintained in the range of 20 oC. These investigations cover two separate situations: Case (i) constant pressure and varying power, and Case (ii) constant power and varying pressure. Limited explorations reveal a significant impact of dissolved nitrogen (saturated) at 1000 PSIA 9th Int. Conf. on Boiling and Condensation Heat Transfer, Boulder, CO, April, 2015.
Leyse’s work is truly pioneering although this field has decades of publications. Following is a from my GOOGLE search, “ Liquid Sublayer Dryout model was first developed by Lee and Mudawar (1988) based on common basic mechanisms such as the dryout of a liquid sublayer between and a blanketing vapor in the DNB-type CHF prediction the heated wall.”
Recent publications still focus on Mudawar’s modelling of phase change (boiling) heat transfer in larger dimensions. As one example of several, Developing a Mathematical Model for Nucleate Boiling Regime at High Heat Flux, 11 October 2019, focuses on models of the boiling boundary that are well beyond Leyse’s regime of microscale phase change heat transfer. Here is one phrase from the cited reference, “... macrolayer thicknesses of 50 µm and 150 µm”. There has been no research or modelling in the realm of Leyse’s discoveries in the microscale arena.
Leyse proposes to expand his studies to cover a set of increasing microscale platinum wire diameters. He has already reported extensive work with 7.5 µm elements and limited work with 12.5 µm elements. The set of increasing diameters would range from 15 µm to 300 µm and this would thus include the dimensions of the Mudawar range.
Apparatus is visualized for determining the circulation patterns. It will be assembled by watchmakers. The assembly will consist of several platinum elements. One element will be the heat transfer element while others will be resistance thermometers. A series of runs will have the heat transfer source rotated among the elements. Circulation patterns will be inferred via data analysis.
Microscale process intensification may be explored. At the very high heat fluxes there is intense turbulence in the vicinity of the microscale heat transfer element. A dilute solution of boric acid will decompose within the high temperature field to yield insoluble boric oxide. Some of the boron oxide will deposit on the hot element. There will be partial separation of isotopes, and the mix of deposited boron will be different than nature's blend. Magnified viewing will explore the process and will yield significant discoveries even if isotope separation is not effected.
2. The Technical Objectives and Challenges. (Up to 500 words)
Leyse proposes to expand his studies to cover a set of increasing microscale platinum wire diameters. He has already reported extensive work with 7.5 µm elements and limited work with 12.5 µm elements. The set of increasing diameters will include 15, 30, 60, 120 and 300 μm. Current research is focused well above the microscale range; this new data set will bridge the gap and yield data that will yield new discoveries as well as inspire modelling of microscale phase change heat transfer. This in turn will inspire applications well beyond the current popular liquid sublayer dryout modeling.
Leyse’s work has been effective with millisecond recording. With faster recording, particularly in runs near at the critical pressure, further insights will likely appear. That is the nature of research and development. Another area for improvement is the maintaining of constant heat flux during runs at constant power and reducing pressure from 150 atmospheres to ambient pressure.
Leyse’s discoveries are in three areas of microscale heat transfer: runs at a series of constant pressures and increasing power, runs at a series of fixed powers and decreasing pressure, and a run at 1000 PSIA with dissolved nitrogen (saturated). The runs at constant pressure, 200 to 6000 PSIA , have yielded data at heat fluxes up to 4000 watts per square centimeter (a record for pool boiling in water), a very informative transcritical run at 3000 PSIA, and other significant discoveries. The runs a fixed powers and reducing pressure yielded a set of nested plots with interesting jumps and transitions. The run with dissolved nitrogen led to Leyse US Patent 5,621,161.
The proposed runs at the set of increasing diameters will yield further discoveries. Very importantly they will put an end to the domination of Mudavar’s liquid sublayer dryout modelling in boiling heat transfer. This will open up the field of research and that will yield applications.
The broad area of Microscale Process Intensification is strongly attractive as research and development. Harnessing the intense turbulence that accompanies the very high heat fluxes that are easily achieved is an interesting challenge. Designing and constructing the apparatus for measuring the agitation will yield innovations; it is not inconceivable that there will be a market for this. The classification of this turbulence via a set of microscale platinum sensors is new. The proposal to investigate the thermal decomposition of boric acid and deposition on the platinum element is intriguing. Even if isotope separation is not achieved, with the development of this process and the study of the decomposition with magnification is likely to yield discoveries that are beyond the range of anticipation; that is research and development!
3. The
Market Opportunity. (Up to 250 words)
This very definitely is a highly speculative set of activities with the potential for extremely high returns. The internet is a vital tool in tracking the status of technology, identifying prospects and serving clients. Leyse has demonstrated his effective use of the internet in Part 1 of this Project Pitch.
4. The
Company and Team. (Up to 250 words)
INZ is currently a one man operation. With the internet, a clever operator has highly
expanded capabilities. For example,
California Fine Wire Company is an independent and vital resource.
Wednesday, July 8, 2020
email exchange with earlier Lienhard MIT
Subject: Boiling on small wires
Date: 7/7/2020 8:11:52 AM Mountain Standard Time
From: JHLienhard@Central.UH.EDU
To: bobleyse@aol.com
Cc: lienhard@mit.edu
Bob,
This note did indeed find a circuitous route to the “earlier
Lienhard.” Thanks for taking the trouble to get it to me.
Your
idea of suppressing the loss of nucleate boiling by pressurizing the system
would be accurate. What happens (as you know from Nanik Bakhru’s and my
paper) is that the first bubble engulfs the wire. That causes local
burnout which then spreads into each neighboring bubble. And no
sustained nucleate boiling can endure.
Bubbles
will be smaller at higher pressure, or, for that matter, at elevated gravity.
So the matter of determining conditions at which nucleate boiling cannot occur
becomes a matter of identifying, and putting to use, the correct scaling
parameters. The end of nucleate boiling will occur under different
conditions, should you change the pressure (or gravity.)
In
any case, it’s good to see someone looking into these matters. Too many
people ignore them.
John (IV)
From: bobleyse@aol.com
To: GERVAISC@MIT.EDU
Sent: 7/6/2020 2:11:52 PM Mountain Standard Time
Subject: Please pass this on
Sent: 7/6/2020 2:11:52 PM Mountain Standard Time
Subject: Please pass this on
Christine Gervais,
The following likely relates to an earlier Lienhard, however, I would appreciate your drawing the following to the attention of the current J. H. Lienhard.
9th International
Conference on Boiling and Condensation Heat Transfer
MICROSCALE
PHASE CHANGE HEAT TRANSFER TO WATER
Robert H.
Leyse*
INZ Inc., P. O.
Box 2850, Sun Valley, ID 83353
April 26-30,
2015 – Boulder, Colorado
bobleyse@aol.com
Bakhru and
Lienhard4, 1972, asserted in their publication, BOILING FROM SMALL CYLINDERS,
that, “Nucleate boiling does not occur on the small wires” and “Three modes of
heat removal are identified for the monotonic curve and described analytically:
a natural convection mode, a mixed film boiling and natural convection mode,
and a pure film boiling mode.” However, although those wires are three to ten
times the diameter of the 7.5 micron platinum wires of this work; this work
clearly revealed nucleate boiling from the small wires. Balhru and Lienhard
only performed experiments at low pressures; it would be a relatively easy
experiment to deploy those wires at higher pressures in order to reveal a
transition to nucleate boiling.
Bakhru, N. and
Lienhard, J. H., Boiling from small cylinders, Int. J. Heat and Mass
Transfer, vol. 15, pp. 2011-2025, 1972
Sun
Valley, Idaho
Saturday, July 4, 2020
INPO must release docs that are referenced in NRC licensing
Sent around March, 2020.
Leyse
P. O. Box 2850
Sun Valley, Idaho 83353
Robert F. Willard, CEO
Institute of Nuclear Power Operations
700 Galleria Parkway, SE, Suite 100
Atlanta, GA 30339-5943GalAAAAASleria Parkway, SE, Suite 100 700 Galleria Parkway, SE, Suite 100
Dear Robert F. Willard,
INPO should quietly shape up and release all of the INPO documents that are referenced in
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0815/ML081560316.pdf (NEDO-33262, Rev. 2). An informed
public enhances surveillance. Also release INPO Significant Event Report, SER 76-84.
40 years ago we had an unfortunate start for INPO; GOOGLE Lightning,NSAC and INPO.
Also GOOGLE: Lightning: INPO's Early Stumble; a Staggering Start.
Robert H. Leyse
Leyse
P. O. Box 2850
Sun Valley, Idaho 83353
Robert F. Willard, CEO
Institute of Nuclear Power Operations
700 Galleria Parkway, SE, Suite 100
Atlanta, GA 30339-5943GalAAAAASleria Parkway, SE, Suite 100 700 Galleria Parkway, SE, Suite 100
Dear Robert F. Willard,
INPO should quietly shape up and release all of the INPO documents that are referenced in
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0815/ML081560316.pdf (NEDO-33262, Rev. 2). An informed
public enhances surveillance. Also release INPO Significant Event Report, SER 76-84.
40 years ago we had an unfortunate start for INPO; GOOGLE Lightning,NSAC and INPO.
Also GOOGLE: Lightning: INPO's Early Stumble; a Staggering Start.
Robert H. Leyse
Wednesday, March 4, 2020
Jack Welch and Fukushima
Jack Welch bestowed lavish and public praise on those managers in nuclear power who produced the bottom-line dollars that he admired. Missing from the WSJ coverage of Jack is any reference to Fukushima.
Saturday, February 15, 2020
Jan K. Leyse
Jan K. Leyse
Jan Leyse, 90, died on January 22, following brief and loving care
at St. Luke’s Medical Center in Ketchum. A memorial service is planned at
the entrance lobby of the St. Luke’s hospital on Tuesday, February 11 at 4:00
PM. St. Luke’s will serve refreshments.
Since moving to Sun Valley, with her husband, 22 years ago, Jan
spent most of her days volunteering for her favorite causes. Jan was involved in the Community Library
Home Tour, Sun Valley Summer Symphony, and served on the Sun Valley Ski Club
Board for many years. Jan’s most recent service was with the St.
Luke’s Wood River Volunteer Core Board. Jan
started volunteering at the hospital in the year 2000 and soon after joined the
Board of Directors. Jan held a board seat for 6 years. Her positions on the Board included Treasure, Historian,
Co-Chair of the Autumn Gala, and President of the Board. Jan highly appreciated
the cooperation of her associates.
If Jan was your
friend, it was a relationship for life. She was an ethical, honest, and loyal,
loving friend. She also had an amazing mathematical mind. Not only could she
file your income taxes in record time, she ran a tight budget with a to-the-penny
balance in the Board’s accounts. She loved being the Treasurer; it was her best
forte and contribution to the organization. We were blessed to have her talent
and continued dedication.
Prior to Sun Valley,
Jan provided decades of service to several organizations, including the
American Association of University Women, of which she was President of the Saratoga,
California branch. She also volunteered at the John Muir Memorial Hospital.
Jan was a graduate of the University of Colorado Boulder where
she took first place in Women’s Athletic Association archery and skied at every
opportunity. On a personal level, Jan was a compassionate listener and knew
just what to say to help you realize there are two sides to every story, look
at your part in it, and come up with the best outcome for everyone involved. In
the end she wanted everyone to be happy. And to her end, may she rest in peace
and long live her best outcome in the legacy of her sons Scott and Mark.
Friday, December 27, 2019
FOIA Appeal NRC-2020-000097 Submitted
Subject: FOIA Appeal NRC-2020-000097 Submitted
Date: 12/26/2019 6:14:58 AM Mountain Standard Time
From: admin@foiaonline.gov
To: bobleyse@aol.com
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Date: 12/26/2019 7:21:12 AM Mountain Standard Time
From: admin@foiaonline.gov
To: bobleyse@aol.com
Subject: NRC-2020-000097 Admin Close
Date: 12/26/2019 7:34:53 AM Mountain Standard Time
From: TINA.ENNIS@nrc.gov
To: bobleyse@aol.com
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
December 26, 2019
NRC-2020-000097
(NRC-2020-000007)
Mr. Robert Leyse
P.O. Box 2850
Sun Valley, ID 83353
Dear Mr. Leyse:
This in response to your letter dated December 18, 2019, in which you sought to appeal our November 5, 2019, administrative closure of your request for various AEOD and/or NSAC documents that were referenced in a December 13, 1984 letter.1
Our October 21, 2019 email notified you of an advanced payment of $1,089.45, as the NRC's FOIA regulations direct us to obtain an advance payment from a requester whenever the estimated fees exceed $250.00, before we continue with the processing of such a request. We also informed you that if we did not receive payment by November 4, 2019, we would administratively close our file on your request. You responded by justifying that you “should not be classified as ‘non-excepted because this is an investigation of corrupt practices between NRC and NSAC.” After sending you a copy of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)’s government-wide Guidelines for FOIA Fees, and acknowledging your stated reason for submitting your request, that reason does not fall within any of the favored fee categories (i.e., representative of the news media, an educational institution, or non-commercial scientific institution) under the FOIA and the OMB guidelines.
Since we did not receive the payment of estimated fees associated with processing your request by the given deadline, your request was not perfected under the statute. The agency’s administrative closing of our file on your request is not an adverse determination from which you may appeal. See 10 CFR 9.29.
If you choose to re-submit your request, please keep in mind that the fee estimate associated with processing your request, as originally described, is expected to remain the same and you will be required to pay the estimated fee before your request will be processed. However, you may choose to narrow the scope of your request to reduce the cost.
Sincerely,
Stephanie Blaney /s/
Stephanie A. Blaney
FOIA Officer
Office of the Chief Information Officer
1 In your original request, you identified four documents, as well as all records reflecting the technical relationship between NSAC and AEOD. You then supplemented/clarified that you were interested in obtaining copies of any AEOD documents that reflect upon its relationship with NSAC (even if not a document between the two entities).
Date: 12/26/2019 6:14:58 AM Mountain Standard Time
From: admin@foiaonline.gov
To: bobleyse@aol.com
Sent from the Internet (Details)
This message is to notify you of a new appeal submission to the FOIAonline application. Appeal information is as follows:
- Appeal Tracking Number: NRC-2020-000097
- Request Tracking Number: NRC-2020-000007
- Requester Name: Robert Leyse
- Date Submitted: 12/26/2019
- Appeal Status: Submitted
- Description: Appeal the administrative closure due to failure to pay fees associated with NRC-2020-000007
Date: 12/26/2019 7:21:12 AM Mountain Standard Time
From: admin@foiaonline.gov
To: bobleyse@aol.com
The FOIA appeal - NRC-2020-000097 description has been modified. Additional details for this item are as follows:
- Tracking Number: NRC-2020-000097
- Requester: Robert Leyse
- Submitted Date: 12/26/2019
- Description: Appeal the administrative closure due to failure to pay fees associated with NRC-2020-000007
Date: 12/26/2019 7:34:53 AM Mountain Standard Time
From: TINA.ENNIS@nrc.gov
To: bobleyse@aol.com
Dear Mr. Leyse,
Please find attached a copy of NRC’s final response to your FOIA appeal, NRC-2020-000097.
Thank you,
Tina Ennis
FOIA Analyst (QualX Contractor)
OCIO/GEMS/ISB
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissi
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
December 26, 2019
NRC-2020-000097
(NRC-2020-000007)
Mr. Robert Leyse
P.O. Box 2850
Sun Valley, ID 83353
Dear Mr. Leyse:
This in response to your letter dated December 18, 2019, in which you sought to appeal our November 5, 2019, administrative closure of your request for various AEOD and/or NSAC documents that were referenced in a December 13, 1984 letter.1
Our October 21, 2019 email notified you of an advanced payment of $1,089.45, as the NRC's FOIA regulations direct us to obtain an advance payment from a requester whenever the estimated fees exceed $250.00, before we continue with the processing of such a request. We also informed you that if we did not receive payment by November 4, 2019, we would administratively close our file on your request. You responded by justifying that you “should not be classified as ‘non-excepted because this is an investigation of corrupt practices between NRC and NSAC.” After sending you a copy of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)’s government-wide Guidelines for FOIA Fees, and acknowledging your stated reason for submitting your request, that reason does not fall within any of the favored fee categories (i.e., representative of the news media, an educational institution, or non-commercial scientific institution) under the FOIA and the OMB guidelines.
Since we did not receive the payment of estimated fees associated with processing your request by the given deadline, your request was not perfected under the statute. The agency’s administrative closing of our file on your request is not an adverse determination from which you may appeal. See 10 CFR 9.29.
If you choose to re-submit your request, please keep in mind that the fee estimate associated with processing your request, as originally described, is expected to remain the same and you will be required to pay the estimated fee before your request will be processed. However, you may choose to narrow the scope of your request to reduce the cost.
Sincerely,
Stephanie Blaney /s/
Stephanie A. Blaney
FOIA Officer
Office of the Chief Information Officer
1 In your original request, you identified four documents, as well as all records reflecting the technical relationship between NSAC and AEOD. You then supplemented/clarified that you were interested in obtaining copies of any AEOD documents that reflect upon its relationship with NSAC (even if not a document between the two entities).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)