In the third paragraph of the above page you will read: "The NRC decided to remove the references to the above two documents in the final FRN because (1) they did not constitute a significant part of the basis for denying the petition and (2) the reports were not then available in the NRC's files." Of course that leads to the question: Since the NRC did not have the reports, how could they conclude that they did not constitute a signifcant part of the basis for denying the petition?
G20100104/LTR-10-0073/LTR-10-0074/EDATS: SECY-2010-0115 - Ltr. Timothy J. McGinty Re: Release of Documents Referenced in SECY-05-0113.
ML100950085
2010-04-16
No comments:
Post a Comment