It is not difficult to petition the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. It is useless.
So, Click on the blue link to view the original PRM-50-76. The battling continues.
[PDF] Petition of Robert H. Leyse re: changes to 10 CFR Part 50 ...
Page 1. 20B6227740 JAN LEYSE DOCKET NUMBER DOCKETED PETITIONRULE USNRC Secre y((oFRS g3 May 8,2002 (3:15PM) ... pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0222/ML022240009.pdf - 2010-09-18
And here is NRC's defective Technical Analysis. Click on the following blue link to read that.
[PDF] Memo to Matthews/Black-Technical Safety Analysis of PRM ...
... OAR in ADAMS? (Y or N) Y ADAMS ACCESSION NO.: ML041210109TEMPLATE NO. ... C:\ORPCheckout\FileNET\ML041210109.wpd Page 3. ... pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0412/ML041210109.pdf - 2010-09-22
The above technical analysis is substantially flawed, and after a while I e-mailed the following to the Chairman NRC. Click on the blue link below and go to page 2.
[PDF] LTR-06-0529 - E-mail Robert H. Leyse re: PRM-50-76, A ...
I never heard back from the NRC, so I told my Senator Larry Craig to get after the NRC. The NRC responded to Senator Craig about 6 months later and that response was over four years ago. Senator Craig never told me about the NRC response, however, I ran across it on ADAMS a few weeks ago, ADAMS ML070540103. Click on the blue link below to view that.
[PDF] G20070046/LTR-07-0040 - Sen. Larry Craig Ltr. re Appendix ...
And today, November 16, 2011, I am adding to this set of documents. Below is an e-mail that I sent to Idaho Senator Risch, requesting that he get after the NRC to respond to my needs for assorted details relevant to PRM-50-76.
So today, January 14, 2012, I am again adding to this entry. NRC responded (unsatisfactorily)and the NRC response is below, a cover letter and the response follow.
You may also read an enlarged access to the following via ADAMS:
[PDF] G20110784/LTR-11-0597/EDATS: SECY-2011-0582 ...
Page 1. Enclosure Response to Constituent Questions from SenatorJames E. Risch Letter of November 3, 2011 1. The ... pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1133/ML11336A055.pdf - 2011-12-30
Among the deficiencies in the NRC response is the disclosure that the two NRU tests have also been discarded by the NRC. So, I wrote a straightforward letter to Senator Risch requesting further action on that: WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR THAT REJECTION? I'll have to again request action by the Senator.
So, Click on the blue link to view the original PRM-50-76. The battling continues.
[PDF] Petition of Robert H. Leyse re: changes to 10 CFR Part 50 ...
Page 1. 20B6227740 JAN LEYSE DOCKET NUMBER DOCKETED PETITIONRULE USNRC Secre y((oFRS g3 May 8,2002 (3:15PM) ... pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0222/ML022240009.pdf - 2010-09-18
And here is NRC's defective Technical Analysis. Click on the following blue link to read that.
[PDF] Memo to Matthews/Black-Technical Safety Analysis of PRM ...
... OAR in ADAMS? (Y or N) Y ADAMS ACCESSION NO.: ML041210109TEMPLATE NO. ... C:\ORPCheckout\FileNET\ML041210109.wpd Page 3. ... pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0412/ML041210109.pdf - 2010-09-22
The above technical analysis is substantially flawed, and after a while I e-mailed the following to the Chairman NRC. Click on the blue link below and go to page 2.
[PDF] LTR-06-0529 - E-mail Robert H. Leyse re: PRM-50-76, A ...
I never heard back from the NRC, so I told my Senator Larry Craig to get after the NRC. The NRC responded to Senator Craig about 6 months later and that response was over four years ago. Senator Craig never told me about the NRC response, however, I ran across it on ADAMS a few weeks ago, ADAMS ML070540103. Click on the blue link below to view that.
[PDF] G20070046/LTR-07-0040 - Sen. Larry Craig Ltr. re Appendix ...
And today, November 16, 2011, I am adding to this set of documents. Below is an e-mail that I sent to Idaho Senator Risch, requesting that he get after the NRC to respond to my needs for assorted details relevant to PRM-50-76.
So today, January 14, 2012, I am again adding to this entry. NRC responded (unsatisfactorily)and the NRC response is below, a cover letter and the response follow.
You may also read an enlarged access to the following via ADAMS:[PDF] G20110784/LTR-11-0597/EDATS: SECY-2011-0582 ...
Page 1. Enclosure Response to Constituent Questions from SenatorJames E. Risch Letter of November 3, 2011 1. The ... pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1133/ML11336A055.pdf - 2011-12-30
Among the deficiencies in the NRC response is the disclosure that the two NRU tests have also been discarded by the NRC. So, I wrote a straightforward letter to Senator Risch requesting further action on that: WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR THAT REJECTION? I'll have to again request action by the Senator.
No comments:
Post a Comment