Comment Number 1, Performance-Based Emergency Core Cooling Systems Cladding Acceptance Criteria

I'll edit this later,for now, here it is. ADAMS ML14098A491

1
Rulemaking1CEm Resource
From: RulemakingComments Resource
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 4:41 PM
To: Rulemaking1CEm Resource
Cc: RulemakingComments Resource
Subject: FW: Strange reference to Baker-Just
DOCKETED BY USNRC—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
SECY-067
PR#: PR-50 and PR-52
FRN#: 79FR16105
NRC DOCKET#: NRC–2008–0332, NRC–2012–0041, NRC– 2012–0042, NRC–2012–0043
SECY DOCKET DATE: 04/03/14
TITLE: Performance-Based Emergency Core Cooling Systems Cladding
Acceptance Criteria
COMMENT#: 01
From: Bobleyse@aol.com [mailto:Bobleyse@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 9:10 PM
To: Inverso, Tara
Subject: Strange reference to Baker-Just
A Strange reference to Baker-Just
16116 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Proposed Rules
For this case, appendix K to 10 CFR part
50 ECCS evaluation models would
continue to use the Baker-Just (BJ)
weight gain correlation for estimating
the rate of energy release and hydrogen
generation from the metal/water
reaction.
It is strange that BJ is deployed, because neither Baker-Just nor BJ is used elsewhere in
the entire document.
Furthermore, it is strange that only Cathcart-Pawel is used in Figure 1; there is no
comparison with Baker-Just:
2
Robert H. Leyse bobleyse@aol.com
Hearing Identifier: Secy_RuleMaking_comments_Public
Email Number: 987
Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0016513891473)
Subject: FW: Strange reference to Baker-Just
Sent Date: 4/8/2014 4:40:57 PM
Received Date: 4/8/2014 4:40:59 PM
From: RulemakingComments Resource
Created By: RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov
Recipients:
"RulemakingComments Resource" <RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None
"Rulemaking1CEm Resource" <Rulemaking1CEm.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None
Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov
Files Size Date & Time
MESSAGE 1193 4/8/2014 4:40:59 PM
Untitled.jpg 28993
Options
Priority: Standard
Return Notification: No
Reply Requested: No
Sensitivity: Normal
Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: