[PDF] LTR-06-0529 - E-mail Robert H. Leyse re: PRM-50-76, A ...
Sometimes that will not open, so I've also copied that one page below.
For emphasis, I am repeating the main paragraph of my e-mail dated October 13, 2006. The NRC stated that, "More than 50 tests were conducted to evaluate the thermal-hydraulic and mechanical deformation behavior of a full length 32-rod nuclear bundle during the heatup, reflood and quench phases of a large break LOCA." And that, "The NRC is reviewing the data from this program to determine the value of using it to assess the current generation of codes such as TRAC-M (Reference 20), now renamed TRACE."
http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0412/ML041210109.pdf
Click on the following to view NRC's response my e-mail to NRC Chairman and note that, "The agency intends to compare the data from two of the NRU tests to TRACE predictions of those experiments as part of its overall assessment of the code."
http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0705/ML070540103.pdf
Click on the following to view NRC funded work that NRC covered-up, see Figures 17 and 18.http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/3318092.pdf
Recall that in its letter to Senator Craig, the NRC said that it "... intends to compare the data from two of the NRU tests to TRACE predictions ..." Indeed,the NRC had already compared two sets of NRU data to its code predictions as disclosed in its contractor report, INEEL/EXT-99-00571, during 1999, well in advance of my submittal of PRM-50-76 dated May 1, 2002. It is also "interesting" that report INEEL/EXT-99-00571 is currently in non-public ADAMS although it may become available to the public (in response to my request).
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purv/10188341-UM0U6M/native/
No comments:
Post a Comment